0907 GMT May 20, 2018
Why the atmospheres of the rocky planets in the inner solar system evolved so differently over 4⅗ billion years is key to understanding what makes a planet habitable, phys.org wrote.
While Earth is a life-rich water-world, our smaller neighbor Mars lost much of its atmosphere early in its history, transforming from a warm and wet environment to the cold and arid plains that we observe today.
By contrast, Earth's other neighbor Venus, which although inhospitable today is comparable in size to our own planet, and has a dense atmosphere.
One way that is often thought to help protect a planet's atmosphere is through an internally generated magnetic field, such as at Earth.
The magnetic field deflects charged particles of the solar wind as they stream away from the Sun, carving out a protective 'bubble' — the magnetosphere — around the planet.
At Mars and Venus, which don't generate an internal magnetic field, the main obstacle to the solar wind is the upper atmosphere, or ionosphere.
Just as on Earth, solar ultraviolet radiation separates electrons from the atoms and molecules in this region, creating a region of electrically charged — ionized — gas: The ionosphere.
At Mars and Venus this ionized layer interacts directly with the solar wind and its magnetic field to create an induced magnetosphere, which acts to slow and divert the solar wind around the planet.
For 14 years, ESA's Mars Express has been looking at charged ions, such as oxygen and carbon dioxide, flowing out to space in order to better understand the rate at which the atmosphere is escaping the planet.
The study has uncovered a surprising effect, with the Sun's ultraviolet radiation playing a more important role than previously thought.
Robin Ramstad of the Swedish Institute of Space Physics, and lead author of the Mars Express study, said, "We used to think that the ion escape occurs due to an effective transfer of the solar wind energy through the Martian induced magnetic barrier to the ionosphere.
"Perhaps counter-intuitively, what we actually see is that the increased ion production triggered by ultraviolet solar radiation shields the planet's atmosphere from the energy carried by the solar wind, but very little energy is actually required for the ions to escape by themselves, due to the low gravity binding the atmosphere to Mars."
The ionizing nature of the Sun's radiation is found to produce more ions than can be removed by the solar wind.
Although the increased ion production helps to shield the lower atmosphere from the energy carried by the solar wind, the heating of the electrons appears to be sufficient to drag along ions under all conditions, creating a 'polar wind'.
Mars' weak gravity — about one third that of Earth's — means the planet cannot hold on to these ions and they readily escape into space, regardless of the extra energy supplied by a strong solar wind.
At Venus, where the gravity is similar to Earth's, a lot more energy is required to strip the atmosphere in this way, and ions leaving the sunward side would likely fall back towards the planet on the lee-side unless they are accelerated further.
Robin said, "We therefore conclude that in the present day, ion escape from Mars is primarily production-limited, and not energy-limited, whereas at Venus it is likely to be energy-limited given the larger planet's higher gravity and high rate of ionization, being nearer to the Sun.
"In other words, the solar wind likely only had a very small direct effect on the amount of Mars atmosphere that has been lost over time, and rather only enhances the acceleration of already escaping particles.”
Dmitri Titov, ESA's Mars Express Project Scientist, said, "Continuous monitoring of Mars since 2004, which covered the change in solar activity from solar minimum to maximum, gives us a large dataset that is vital in understanding the long-term behavior of a planet's atmosphere and its interaction with the Sun.
"Collaboration with NASA's MAVEN mission, which has been at Mars since 2014, is also allowing us to study the atmospheric escape processes in more detail."
The study also has implications for the search for Earth-like atmospheres elsewhere in the Universe.
Dmitri said, "Perhaps a magnetic field is not as important in shielding a planet's atmosphere as the planet's gravity itself, which defines how well it can hang on to its atmospheric particles after they have been ionized by the Sun's radiation, regardless of the power of the solar wind.”