|
|
Volunteer torture victim Maboub Ebrahimzdeh lies on the sidewalk after a waterboarding demonstration in front of the Justice Department in Washington DC, in November 2007.
|
The Senate Intelligence Committee voted to limit CIA interrogators to techniques approved by the military, which would effectively bar them from waterboarding prisoners, AP quoted congressional officials as saying.
The vote Tuesday on an amendment by Sen. Diane Feinstein, a California Democrat, was taken behind closed doors as the committee debated legislation to authorize money for intelligence operations in 2009, marks at least the second attempt by intelligence overseers in Congress to regulate CIA questioning of detainees. Congressional officials discussed the vote on condition of anonymity because the vote was secret.
Bush’s Bill
President George W. Bush vetoed the 2008 intelligence authorization bill in March because it included the same curbs on questioning techniques. This interrogation provision, if passed by the full Senate and House, would likely face the same fate.
Committee officials refused to comment because deliberations over the bill were ongoing. The bill was expected to be completed later this week.
In a statement announcing her intention to offer the amendment, Feinstein said, “United States will never again engage in waterboarding or other harsh interrogation techniques.“
The military rewrote its field manual on interrogation in 2006 in the wake of the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal in Iraq. It outlines 19 legal interrogation techniques, including--making prisoners think they are in the custody of another country--and the separation of a prisoner from other prisoners for up to 30 days at a time.
It prohibits waterboarding, which simulates drowning. The technique has been traced back hundreds of years, to the Spanish Inquisition, and is condemned by nations around the world. Critics call it a form of torture.
According to the field manual, prisoners may not be hooded or have duct tape put across their eyes. They may not be stripped naked or forced to perform or mimic sexual acts.
They may not be beaten, electrocuted, burned or otherwise physically hurt. They may not be subjected to hypothermia or mock executions. The manual also does not allow food, water and medical treatment to be withheld, and dogs may not be used in any aspect of interrogation.
Objecting the Limitation
CIA Director Michael Hayden has objected to limiting the CIA to military methods, saying the CIA was not consulted on the 19 approved techniques and they do not encompass all lawful, non-abusive methods of interrogation. For example, sleep deprivation is not mentioned in the manual.
The CIA says it has held and interrogated fewer than 100 detainees. It has used interrogation techniques on a third of them, according to Hayden.
Hayden told Congress this spring that the CIA waterboarded three prisoners in 2002 and 2003. In 2006 he ordered a halt to the practice in the wake of a Supreme Court decision and new laws on the treatment of US detainees.
Absent a law against it, waterboarding remains a possibility in future interrogations of terrorism suspects, as long as the president authorizes it after consulting with the attorney general and intelligence officials.
Warning Letter
A March 5 letter from the Justice Department to Congress makes clear the Bush administration has not defined which interrogation methods might violate the Geneva Convention’s bans on “outrages upon personal dignity,“ the Times said.
A senior Justice Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said of the classified information: “I certainly don’t want to suggest that if there’s a good purpose you can head off and humiliate someone.“
But, he said, “the fact that you are doing something for a legitimate security purpose would be relevant ... There are certainly things that can be insulting that would not raise to the level of an outrage on personal dignity.“
The Geneva Conventions prohibit humiliating and degrading treatment of prisoners.