IranDaily
Number 3104 - Sat, Apr 19, 2008 - Farvardin 31 1387- Rabi Al-sani 12 1429

Advanced Search
ADVERTISING RATES
PDF Edition
Front Page
National
Domestic Economy
Science
Energy
Iranica
Society
World
Middle East
International Economy
Sports
Arts & Culture
RSS
Archive

Weather Guide
Tehran
High: 25 - Low: 15

095841.jpg Bushehr

095838.jpg Khorramabad

095844.jpg Rasht

095841.jpg Yazd

095841.jpg Zabol

095841.jpg Beirut

095841.jpg Damascus

095844.jpg Kabul

095838.jpg Moscow

095841.jpg Seoul

Identification
Published by the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA)

Address:
Iran Cultural & Press Institute, #212 Khorramshahr Avenue Tehran/Iran

Chief Editor:
Amir Ali Abolfath

Editorial Dept. Tel: 88755761-2

Editorial Dept. Fax: 88761869

Subscription Dept. Tel: 88329002-4

Advertising Dept. Tel: 88500616-7
Military Prowess On Display
096429.jpg
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday said Iran is the “most powerful nation“ in the world. His statement came as the country’s air force boasted its prowess.
Marking the Islamic Republic’s annual Army Day, the president told a military parade in south Tehran that “Iran is the most powerful and independent nation in the world.“
To mark the occasion, the armed forces were conducting a major fly-by over the parade grounds which included some 200 fighter jets and other aircraft and choppers.
The aircraft included US-made F-4s and F-5s, and several Saeqeh fighter jets produced inside the country.
Iran’s air force has long defied the almost three-decade-old blanket US embargo imposed after the staunchly pro-American Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was toppled in the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
Iran is at odds with the West over its civilian nuclear program and has stressed it needs the nuclear-power for its ambitious economic development programs.
The president said all the branches of the armed forces would respond strongly to any attack against Iran’s territory and said no-one would dare attack the country.
“The army, Revolutionary Guards and the Basij (volunteer forces) will resist with force and respond strongly to the slightest aggression,“ Al-Alam TV quoted him as saying.
The president described Iran as “peace-loving“ but said the army and the IRGC would “react strongly to the slightest aggression“.
“I am proud to announce today that the Iranian nation’s power is to the extent that no major power can dare undermine the security and interests of the nation. The Iranian nation and its courageous army will defend its interests.“
096267.jpg US Troops Face
Major Health Crisis
Continue...
Esteqlal Defeated
Continue...
096417.jpg Anti-Terror Cooperation Talks With Turks
Continue...
096414.jpg Israeli Crimes Condemned
Continue...
Perspec
Managing Chaos
By Aziz Shah-Mohammadi
After taking over Downing Street from Tony Blair last June, Gordon Brown has met George Bush twice.
The British premier addressed a joint press conference with the embattled Bush on Thursday in Washington and said the world owes Bush a huge debt of gratitude for leading the world “in our determination to root out terrorism and ensure that there’s no safe haven for terrorism and no hiding place for terrorists“.
The Brown salutation for Bush comes at a time when the former colonial power has been aiding the US in its invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan --a move condemned by British military commanders as foolish and na•ve.
Not only has the latest Anglo-American military venture in Iraq and Afghanistan failed miserably to root out terrorism, rather it has resulted in more terrorism and instability in the strategic Middle East.
Brown is simply not oblivious to the fact that his flattery of Bush is geared at lying and deceiving public opinion about what actually is unfolding in the two war-battered countries.
Brown also knows that neither his country nor Bush’s America has been able to curb terrorism, let alone eradicate it.
In actuality, the problem with US, British and French leaders in the Middle East is their unpopularity. The three have indeed lost their political credibility in the Middle East largely due to their systemic failures in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Therefore, Brown’s sycophancy can only make sense as some sort of “political courtesy“. Britain and the US are grappling with a mountain of challenges in the Middle East which cannot be resolved through toadyism.
It is obvious that an honest war on terror demands the establishment of democracy and respect for human rights.
America and some European states are visibly plagued with what can be called “managing chaos“.
Instead of showering misplaced praise on Bush’s invasion, occupation, torture and discord, Brown would do better to address Britain’s fast multiplying problems.